BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//79.170.40.162//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:INTEGRA CPD
X-WR-CALDESC:Next-Generation Training &amp\; Development for Counsellors &a
 mp\; Psychotherapists
X-FROM-URL:https://integra-cpd.co.uk
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/London
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20231029T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
RDATE:20241027T020000
TZNAME:GMT
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20240331T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:ai1ec-12233@integra-cpd.co.uk
DTSTAMP:20240425T141523Z
CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-GB:All Counsellors &amp\; Psychotherapists\,Training
  Courses\,Workshop Groups (10 +)
CONTACT:Michael Soth\; +44 1865 725 205\; info@integra-cpd.co.uk
DESCRIPTION:Finding your own style within the spectrum of 21st-century psyc
 hotherapy\n \n“Beyond our ideas of right-doing and wrong-doing\,\nthere is
  a field. I’ll meet you there.\nWhen the soul lies down in that grass\,\nt
 he world is too full to talk about.”\nRumi\nIn this session I will invite 
 you to explore the therapeutic space beyond notions of right or wrong\, be
 yond ideas of best theory\, correct technique\, practice by the book or ma
 nual.\nI will invite you to use all your faculties\, all your knowledge\, 
 all your woundedness and sensitivity to get a flavour of your own therapeu
 tic style\, that is free to draw fluidly and integratively from the wealth
  of therapeutic knowledge and expertise humans have accumulated.\nAs C.G. 
 Jung said: “There should only be one Jungian therapist – me.”\nEverybody e
 lse - including you and me - we need to find our own style\, rooted in our
  own relational complexity and embodied in our own history\, wounds and li
 mitations as well as gifts and potential. As we can only find this in the 
 moment\, rather than through thinking or theory only\, this session will w
 eave between experience and reflection\, between skills practice and discu
 ssion\, engaging you with your next step at your growing edge.\n \nWe may 
 draw from the following themes what seems most relevant and urgent.\nCreat
 ing an open\, inviting therapeutic space\n‘Nothing human is foreign to me.
 ’\nWhat gets in the way of full engagement?\nWhat limits the client’s expe
 rience of the therapeutic space?\nPhenomenological enquiry into the therap
 ist’s internal process: how is the therapist behaving habitually in ways t
 hat are\, for example\, fixed\, limited\, restrained\, unresponsive or ove
 rly-giving?\nFocussing on the therapist’s ‘construction’ of the therapeuti
 c space.\nCreating an effective transformative therapeutic space\n‘Allowin
 g the client’s unconscious to construct me as an object.’\nWhat limits a f
 ull and deeply transformative process?\nPhenomenological enquiry into the 
 therapist’s external effects: how are the therapist’s responses/interventi
 ons countertherapeutic?\nThe doctor-friend polarity\ntherapy as treatment 
 (‘medical model’) versus therapy as collusive friendship\nobjectifying/pat
 hologising versus colluding/avoidant\ntherapy as relationship\nobjectifyin
 g – differentiating – identifying – colluding\nThe client’s conflict: habi
 tual mode versus emergency\n‘something desperately has to happen’ – ‘nothi
 ng has to happen/nothing to be imposed’\nthe client’s character conflicts 
 / the ego-Self axis\nA broad-spectrum integration of approaches\nThe shatt
 ered and fragmented postmodern wholeness\nDrawing on the gifts and wisdom 
 of the whole field (fragmentation of the field reflects the fragmented mod
 ern psyche – the integration of the client’s psyche into wholeness require
 s the integration of the whole field)\nThe history of schisms and conflict
 s in the psychotherapeutic field and how it affects us now\nintegration an
 d dis-integration\ncherry-picking approaches versus full-spectrum integrat
 ion\ntherapeutic approach cannot be grasped by theory and technique – unde
 rlying implicit relational stance\nThe therapist’s habitual\, wounded\, fi
 xed position\nMoving beyond a one-dimensional therapeutic position\nThe wo
 unded healer position\nThe therapist’s habitual position – inheriting the 
 wounds of our family ancestors\, our therapeutic ancestors\, or cultural a
 ncestors …\nThe therapist’s shadow\nThe dangers of integration\nShifting f
 rom therapeutic approaches to relational modalities\nGomez\, Stark\, Clark
 son\, Michael’s Diamond model: what kind of therapeutic relatedness?\nGome
 z: humanistic ‘alongside’ stance versus psychodynamic ‘opposite’ stance\nS
 tark: ‘one-person psychology’\, ‘one-and-a-half-person psychology’\, ‘two-
 person psychology’\nClarkson: working alliance – authentic – reparative – 
 transference/countertransference - transpersonal\nMichael’s Diamond model:
  include ‘medical model’\nunderstanding identifications - projective ident
 ification – transference and countertransference as systemic bodymind proc
 esses\nTranscending dualisms and binaries into paradox\nthe relational par
 adox: transcending treatment versus relationship dualism = paradox of enac
 tment\nI-it and I-I relating\nthe bodymind paradox: transcending mind-over
 -body versus body-over-mind dualism = embodiment/disembodiment paradox\nth
 e central paradox of therapy: the healing of the client’s wounding is inse
 parable from the enactment of wounding in and through therapy.\nThe fracta
 l self: a chain of nested matrices of parallel process\nintegrative/integr
 al\nrelational\nembodied\nsystemic\nparadoxical\n 
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250305T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250305T170000
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Proposed CPD workshop: Engaging beyond therapeutic approach
URL:https://integra-cpd.co.uk/event/proposed-cpd-workshop-engaging-beyond-t
 herapeutic-approach/
X-COST-TYPE:external
X-WP-IMAGES-URL:thumbnail\;https://integra-cpd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Eve
 nt_Images/Narcissus.jpg\;128\;73\;\,medium\;https://integra-cpd.co.uk/wp-c
 ontent/uploads/Event_Images/Narcissus.jpg\;600\;342\;
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//E
 N'>\\n<HTML>\\n<HEAD>\\n<TITLE></TITLE>\\n</HEAD>\\n<BODY><div class='ai1e
 c-event-avatar alignleft timely'><img src='https://integra-cpd.co.uk/wp-co
 ntent/uploads/Event_Images/Narcissus.jpg' width='600' height='342' /></div
 ><h2>Finding your own style within the spectrum of 21st-century psychother
 apy</h2>\n<p> </p>\n<blockquote><p>“Beyond our ideas of right-doing and wr
 ong-doing\,</p>\n<p>there is a field. I’ll meet you there.</p>\n<p>When th
 e soul lies down in that grass\,</p>\n<p>the world is too full to talk abo
 ut.”</p>\n<p><em>Rumi</em></p></blockquote>\n<p>In this session I will inv
 ite you to explore the therapeutic space beyond notions of <em>right</em> 
 or <em>wrong</em>\, beyond ideas of <em>best</em> theory\, <em>correct</em
 > technique\, practice by the book or manual.</p>\n<p>I will invite you to
  use <em>all</em> your faculties\, <em>all</em> your knowledge\, <em>all</
 em> your woundedness and sensitivity to get a flavour of your own therapeu
 tic style\, that is free to draw fluidly and integratively from the wealth
  of therapeutic knowledge and expertise humans have accumulated.</p>\n<p>A
 s C.G. Jung said: “There should only be one Jungian therapist – me.”</p>\n
 <p>Everybody else - including you and me - we need to find <em>our own sty
 le</em>\, rooted in our own relational complexity and embodied in our own 
 history\, wounds and limitations as well as gifts and potential. As we can
  only find this in the moment\, rather than through thinking or theory onl
 y\, this session will weave between experience and reflection\, between sk
 ills practice and discussion\, engaging you with your next step at your gr
 owing edge.</p>\n<p> </p>\n<p>We may draw from the following themes what s
 eems most relevant and urgent.</p>\n<h3>Creating an open\, inviting therap
 eutic space</h3>\n<p>‘Nothing human is foreign to me.’</p>\n<p>What gets i
 n the way of full engagement?</p>\n<p>What limits the client’s experience 
 of the therapeutic space?</p>\n<p>Phenomenological enquiry into the therap
 ist’s internal process: how is the therapist behaving habitually in ways t
 hat are\, for example\, fixed\, limited\, restrained\, unresponsive or ove
 rly-giving?</p>\n<p>Focussing on the therapist’s ‘construction’ of the the
 rapeutic space.</p>\n<h3>Creating an effective transformative therapeutic 
 space</h3>\n<p>‘Allowing the client’s unconscious to construct me as an ob
 ject.’</p>\n<p>What limits a full and deeply transformative process?</p>\n
 <p>Phenomenological enquiry into the therapist’s external effects: how are
  the therapist’s responses/interventions countertherapeutic?</p>\n<h3>The 
 doctor-friend polarity</h3>\n<p>therapy as treatment (‘medical model’) ver
 sus therapy as collusive friendship</p>\n<p>objectifying/pathologising ver
 sus colluding/avoidant</p>\n<p>therapy as relationship</p>\n<p>objectifyin
 g – differentiating – identifying – colluding</p>\n<h3>The client’s confli
 ct: habitual mode versus emergency</h3>\n<p>‘something desperately has to 
 happen’ – ‘nothing has to happen/nothing to be imposed’</p>\n<p>the client
 ’s character conflicts / the ego-Self axis</p>\n<h3>A broad-spectrum integ
 ration of approaches</h3>\n<p>The shattered and fragmented postmodern whol
 eness</p>\n<p>Drawing on the gifts and wisdom of the <em>whole</em> field 
 (fragmentation of the field reflects the fragmented modern <em>psyche</em>
  – the integration of the client’s <em>psyche</em> into wholeness requires
  the integration of the whole field)</p>\n<p>The history of schisms and co
 nflicts in the psychotherapeutic field and how it affects us now</p>\n<p>i
 ntegration and dis-integration</p>\n<p>cherry-picking approaches versus fu
 ll-spectrum integration</p>\n<p>therapeutic approach cannot be grasped by 
 theory and technique – underlying implicit relational stance</p>\n<h3>The 
 therapist’s habitual\, wounded\, fixed position</h3>\n<p>Moving beyond a o
 ne-dimensional therapeutic position</p>\n<p>The wounded healer position</p
 >\n<p>The therapist’s habitual position – inheriting the wounds of our fam
 ily ancestors\, our therapeutic ancestors\, or cultural ancestors …</p>\n<
 p>The therapist’s shadow</p>\n<p>The dangers of integration</p>\n<h3>Shift
 ing from therapeutic approaches to relational modalities</h3>\n<p>Gomez\, 
 Stark\, Clarkson\, Michael’s Diamond model: what kind of therapeutic relat
 edness?</p>\n<p>Gomez: humanistic ‘alongside’ stance versus psychodynamic 
 ‘opposite’ stance</p>\n<p>Stark: ‘one-person psychology’\, ‘one-and-a-half
 -person psychology’\, ‘two-person psychology’</p>\n<p>Clarkson: working al
 liance – authentic – reparative – transference/countertransference - trans
 personal</p>\n<p>Michael’s Diamond model: include ‘medical model’</p>\n<p>
 understanding identifications - projective identification – transference a
 nd countertransference as systemic bodymind processes</p>\n<h3>Transcendin
 g dualisms and binaries into paradox</h3>\n<p>the relational paradox: tran
 scending treatment versus relationship dualism = paradox of enactment</p>
 \n<p>I-it and I-I relating</p>\n<p>the bodymind paradox: transcending mind
 -over-body versus body-over-mind dualism = embodiment/disembodiment parado
 x</p>\n<p>the central paradox of therapy: the healing of the client’s woun
 ding is inseparable from the enactment of wounding in and through therapy.
 </p>\n<h3>The fractal self: a chain of nested matrices of parallel process
 </h3>\n<p>integrative/integral</p>\n<p>relational</p>\n<p>embodied</p>\n<p
 >systemic</p>\n<p>paradoxical</p>\n<p> </p>\n</BODY></HTML>
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-GB:proposed\,Workshop
X-COST:£90 to £100 per day
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR